R9 280x Vs Gtx 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Price now 265$
Games supported 84%
Price now 165$
Games supported 81%
General info
Comparison of graphics carte du jour architecture, market place segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 234 | 248 |
| Value for money | 12.x | 9.69 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN (2011−2017) |
| GPU lawmaking proper name | N17P-G1 | Thaiti XTL |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | no data | reference |
| Release date | 25 October 2016 (5 years ago) | viii October 2013 (eight years ago) |
| Launch cost (MSRP) | $139 | $299 |
| Price now | $265 (i.9x MSRP) | $165 (0.6x MSRP) |
Value for money
To get the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base of operations clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 2048 |
| CUDA cores | 768 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | no data |
| Heave clock speed | 1392 MHz | thou MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal design ability (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 66.82 | 128.0 |
| Floating-signal operation | two,138 gflops | iv,096 gflops |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Data on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing i. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCIe three.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 275 mm |
| Width | ii-slot | two-slot |
| Supplementary ability connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin + 1 10 8-pin |
Retentivity
Parameters of retentivity installed: its type, size, omnibus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of organization RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory passenger vehicle width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | no information |
| Retention bandwidth | 112 GB/due south | 288 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a dominion, information in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | no information | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
| DisplayPort support | no data | + |
| Thousand-SYNC support | + | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | no data | + |
| CrossFire | no information | 1 |
| Enduro | no data | - |
| FreeSync | no data | 1 |
| HD3D | no information | + |
| LiquidVR | no data | i |
| PowerTune | no data | - |
| TressFX | no information | i |
| TrueAudio | no data | + |
| ZeroCore | no information | - |
| UVD | no data | + |
| DDMA audio | no data | + |
| VR Ready | + | no data |
| Ansel | + | no information |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX® 12 |
| Shader Model | vi.4 | v.i |
| OpenGL | iv.6 | 4.six |
| OpenCL | 1.ii | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
| Drape | no data | - |
| CUDA | + | no data |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark operation comparing. Note that overall criterion performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we ordinarily fix problems apace.
- Passmark
- 3DMark xi Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Burn down Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Water ice Storm GPU
This is probably the virtually ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing iv divide benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, 10, 11 and 12 (the terminal being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Criterion coverage: 25%
3DMark xi is an obsolete DirectX eleven benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, i being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite beingness washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in Jan 2020, 3DMark xi is now superseded by Time Spy.
Criterion coverage: 17%
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and bones notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Simply like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: xiv%
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two divide tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Water ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. Information technology utilizes DirectX 11 characteristic level 9 to brandish a battle betwixt ii infinite fleets nigh a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Criterion coverage: 8%
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon R9 280X. Ordinarily measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 326 Mh/southward | 494 Mh/s |
| Decred / DCR (Decred) | ane.01 Gh/s | ane.07 Gh/southward |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 12.62 Mh/s | 14.42 Mh/s |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.3 kh/s | 0.5 kh/s |
| Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 156.48 Sol/s | 285 Sol/s |
Gaming performance
Let's run into how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.
Here are the average frames per 2d in a large prepare of popular games across unlike resolutions:
| Total HD | 51 | 64 |
| 1440p | 31 | no data |
| 4K | 25 | 28 |
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 20−22 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey | 48 +140% | 20−22 −140% |
| Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −v% |
| Battleground 5 | 63 +215% | 20−22 −215% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24 +5% | xx−22 −5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 +five% | 20−22 −v% |
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −5% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 48 +140% | xx−22 −140% |
| Forza Horizon four | 69 +245% | twenty−22 −245% |
| Hitman 3 | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −v% |
| Horizon Cipher Dawn | 21−24 +five% | 20−22 −5% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35 +75% | twenty−22 −75% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 31 +55% | 20−22 −55% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24 +5% | xx−22 −5% |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40 +100% | 20−22 −100% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −five% |
| Battleground v | 52 +160% | twenty−22 −160% |
| Call of Duty: Mod Warfare | 39 +95% | 20−22 −95% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 +5% | xx−22 −five% |
| Far Weep 5 | 21−24 +v% | 20−22 −5% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 45 +125% | xx−22 −125% |
| Forza Horizon four | 64 +220% | 20−22 −220% |
| Hitman 3 | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −v% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −5% |
| Metro Exodus | 26 +30% | twenty−22 −thirty% |
| Cherry Dead Redemption two | 18 −11.1% | 20−22 +11.1% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27 +35% | twenty−22 −35% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 49 +two.1% | 48 −ii.one% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24 +5% | xx−22 −5% |
Full Hard disk
Ultra Preset
| Assassinator'south Creed Odyssey | 24 +20% | 20−22 −xx% |
| Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −5% |
| Battlefield 5 | 51 +155% | 20−22 −155% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −5% |
| Far Cry 5 | 36 +80% | 20−22 −fourscore% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 41 +105% | xx−22 −105% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45 +125% | 20−22 −125% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Chase | 26 +30% | 20 −thirty% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24 +five% | twenty−22 −5% |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 24 +20% | 20−22 −20% |
| Hitman 3 | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −5% |
| Horizon Zip Dawn | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −5% |
| Metro Exodus | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −5% |
| Ruddy Dead Redemption 2 | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −5% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24 +v% | 20−22 −5% |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24 +v% | 20−22 −5% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −v% |
| Battleground 5 | 36 +80% | twenty−22 −80% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 +five% | 20−22 −5% |
| Far Cry five | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −5% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 29 +45% | 20−22 −45% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −5% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −5% |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24 +v% | xx−22 −5% |
| Hitman 3 | 21−24 +five% | 20−22 −five% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −v% |
| Metro Exodus | 9 −122% | 20−22 +122% |
| Red Dead Redemption ii | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −five% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24 +v% | 20−22 −5% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24 +5% | twenty−22 −5% |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −5% |
| Assassin'south Creed Valhalla | 21−24 +5% | xx−22 −5% |
| Battlefield 5 | 18 −eleven.1% | twenty−22 +11.1% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −5% |
| Far Weep five | 21−24 +v% | 20−22 −5% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14 −42.9% | xx−22 +42.ix% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | twenty +0% | 20−22 +0% |
| Lookout Dogs: Legion | 21−24 +5% | 20−22 −5% |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Operation rating | 21.22 | 19.64 |
| Novelty | 25 Oct 2016 | 8 October 2013 |
| Toll | $139 | $299 |
| Retentivity charabanc width | 128 | 384 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 2048 |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 | 288 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide betwixt
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
and
AMD Radeon R9 280X
The differences in functioning seem too pocket-size.
Should you still take questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall reply.
Cast your vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" push button well-nigh your favorite graphics card.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti from AMD is Radeon R9 380, which is slower by 1% and lower past 2 positions in our rating.
Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti:
Competitors of Radeon R9 280X by NVIDIA
The nearest Radeon R9 280X'south NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce GTX 770, which is faster by 1% and higher past 3 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R9 280X:
Similar GPU comparisons
Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more than or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User rating
Hither you lot can see the user rating of the graphics cards, besides equally rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a calibration of 1 to 5:
Rate AMD Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to five:
Questions and comments
Here you lot can ask a question about this comparing, agree or disagree with our judgements, or study an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1050-Ti-vs-Radeon-R9-280X
Posted by: rinknottionged.blogspot.com
0 Response to "R9 280x Vs Gtx 1050 Ti"
Post a Comment