R9 280x Vs Gtx 1050 Ti
Price now 265$ Games supported 84% Price now 165$ Games supported 81% Comparison of graphics carte du jour architecture, market place segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To get the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base of operations clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Data on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing i. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of retentivity installed: its type, size, omnibus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of organization RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a dominion, information in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark operation comparing. Note that overall criterion performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we ordinarily fix problems apace. This is probably the virtually ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing iv divide benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, 10, 11 and 12 (the terminal being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% 3DMark xi is an obsolete DirectX eleven benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, i being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite beingness washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in Jan 2020, 3DMark xi is now superseded by Time Spy. Criterion coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and bones notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Simply like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: xiv% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two divide tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Water ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. Information technology utilizes DirectX 11 characteristic level 9 to brandish a battle betwixt ii infinite fleets nigh a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Criterion coverage: 8% Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon R9 280X. Ordinarily measured in megahashes per second. Let's run into how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per 2d in a large prepare of popular games across unlike resolutions: +140% −140% +5% −v% +215% −215% +5% −5% +five% −v% +5% −5% +140% −140% +245% −245% +5% −v% +five% −5% +75% −75% +55% −55% +5% −5% +100% −100% +5% −five% +160% −160% +95% −95% +5% −five% +v% −5% +125% −125% +220% −220% +5% −v% +5% −5% +30% −thirty% −11.1% +11.1% +35% −35% +two.1% −ii.one% +5% −5% +20% −xx% +5% −5% +155% −155% +5% −5% +80% −fourscore% +105% −105% +125% −125% +30% −thirty% +five% −5% +20% −20% +5% −5% +5% −5% +5% −5% +5% −5% +v% −5% +v% −5% +5% −v% +80% −80% +five% −5% +5% −5% +45% −45% +5% −5% +5% −5% +v% −5% +five% −five% +5% −v% −122% +122% +5% −five% +v% −5% +5% −5% +5% −5% +5% −5% −eleven.1% +11.1% +5% −5% +v% −5% −42.9% +42.ix% +0% +0% +5% −5% Technical City couldn't decide betwixt NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 280X The differences in functioning seem too pocket-size. Should you still take questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall reply. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" push button well-nigh your favorite graphics card. We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti from AMD is Radeon R9 380, which is slower by 1% and lower past 2 positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: The nearest Radeon R9 280X'south NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce GTX 770, which is faster by 1% and higher past 3 positions in our rating. Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R9 280X: Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more than or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Hither you lot can see the user rating of the graphics cards, besides equally rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a calibration of 1 to 5: Rate AMD Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to five: Here you lot can ask a question about this comparing, agree or disagree with our judgements, or study an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
General info
Place in performance rating 234 248 Value for money 12.x 9.69 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) GCN (2011−2017) GPU lawmaking proper name N17P-G1 Thaiti XTL Market segment Desktop Desktop Design no data reference Release date 25 October 2016 (5 years ago) viii October 2013 (eight years ago) Launch cost (MSRP) $139 $299 Price now $265 (i.9x MSRP) $165 (0.6x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 2048 CUDA cores 768 no data Core clock speed 1290 MHz no data Heave clock speed 1392 MHz thou MHz Number of transistors 3,300 million 4,313 million Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm Thermal design ability (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C no data Texture fill rate 66.82 128.0 Floating-signal operation two,138 gflops iv,096 gflops Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support no data PCIe three.0 Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 145 mm 275 mm Width ii-slot two-slot Supplementary ability connectors None 1 x 6-pin + 1 10 8-pin Retentivity
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5 Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB Memory passenger vehicle width 128 Bit 384 Bit Memory clock speed 7 GB/s no information Retention bandwidth 112 GB/due south 288 GB/s Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort Eyefinity no information + HDMI + + DisplayPort support no data + Thousand-SYNC support + no data Technologies
AppAcceleration no data + CrossFire no information 1 Enduro no data - FreeSync no data 1 HD3D no information + LiquidVR no data i PowerTune no data - TressFX no information i TrueAudio no data + ZeroCore no information - UVD no data + DDMA audio no data + VR Ready + no data Ansel + no information API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) DirectX® 12 Shader Model vi.4 v.i OpenGL iv.6 4.six OpenCL 1.ii 1.2 Vulkan 1.2.131 + Drape no data - CUDA + no data Benchmark performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 326 Mh/southward 494 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) ane.01 Gh/s ane.07 Gh/southward Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 12.62 Mh/s 14.42 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.3 kh/s 0.5 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 156.48 Sol/s 285 Sol/s Gaming performance
Total HD 51 64 1440p 31 no data 4K 25 28 Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 20−22 Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 48 20−22 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 21−24 twenty−22 Battleground 5 63 20−22 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 xx−22 Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 20−22 Far Cry 5 21−24 20−22 Far Cry New Dawn 48 xx−22 Forza Horizon four 69 twenty−22 Hitman 3 21−24 twenty−22 Horizon Cipher Dawn 21−24 20−22 Red Dead Redemption 2 35 twenty−22 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31 20−22 Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 xx−22 Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40 20−22 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 20−22 Battleground v 52 twenty−22 Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 39 20−22 Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 xx−22 Far Weep 5 21−24 20−22 Far Cry New Dawn 45 xx−22 Forza Horizon four 64 20−22 Hitman 3 21−24 twenty−22 Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 20−22 Metro Exodus 26 twenty−22 Cherry Dead Redemption two 18 20−22 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27 twenty−22 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49 48 Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 xx−22 Full Hard disk
Ultra Preset
Assassinator'south Creed Odyssey 24 20−22 Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 21−24 twenty−22 Battlefield 5 51 20−22 Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 twenty−22 Far Cry 5 36 20−22 Far Cry New Dawn 41 xx−22 Forza Horizon 4 45 20−22 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 26 20 Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 twenty−22 1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24 20−22 Hitman 3 21−24 20−22 Horizon Zip Dawn 21−24 twenty−22 Metro Exodus 21−24 20−22 Ruddy Dead Redemption 2 21−24 20−22 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24 20−22 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 20−22 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 twenty−22 Battleground 5 36 twenty−22 Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 20−22 Far Cry five 21−24 20−22 Far Cry New Dawn 29 20−22 Forza Horizon 4 21−24 twenty−22 Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 twenty−22 4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 xx−22 Hitman 3 21−24 20−22 Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 twenty−22 Metro Exodus 9 20−22 Red Dead Redemption ii 21−24 twenty−22 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24 20−22 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 twenty−22 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 20−22 Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 21−24 xx−22 Battlefield 5 18 twenty−22 Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 20−22 Far Weep five 21−24 20−22 Far Cry New Dawn 14 xx−22 Forza Horizon 4 twenty 20−22 Lookout Dogs: Legion 21−24 20−22 Advantages and disadvantages
Operation rating 21.22 19.64 Novelty 25 Oct 2016 8 October 2013 Toll $139 $299 Retentivity charabanc width 128 384 Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 2048 Memory bandwidth 112 288 Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by AMD
Competitors of Radeon R9 280X by NVIDIA
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1050-Ti-vs-Radeon-R9-280X
Posted by: rinknottionged.blogspot.com
0 Response to "R9 280x Vs Gtx 1050 Ti"
Post a Comment